Home Blog Page 261

Blackstone’s Jon Gray pushes back on AI bubble warnings as Griffin sounds the alarm

0

Two of Wall Street’s most powerful voices are looking at the same AI boom and seeing very different things. Blackstone President Jon Gray is rejecting the idea that artificial intelligence has become a bubble.

His pushback came just days after Citadel founder Ken Griffin said investors are “almost certainly” in the middle of one.

Gray’s case: too much demand, not enough supply

Gray’s argument rests on a simple imbalance. He has said the appetite for computing power, driven by increasingly capable AI models, is running well ahead of the infrastructure available to meet it.

In a September 4, 2026 interview with Les Echos Capital Finance, Gray said demand for compute exceeds supply by a significant margin. He framed that gap as the key difference between today’s AI buildout and classic speculative manias.

He also pointed to the scale of spending by the biggest cloud and tech companies, known as hyperscalers. In a September 2026 investor presentation, Gray said hyperscaler capital expenditures doubled to $820 billion, a figure equal to approximately 2.5% of US GDP.

Griffin’s counterpoint: watch the GPUs

Griffin sees the same spending and draws a darker conclusion. Speaking at the Future of Global Markets Conference on October 20, 2026, he argued that investors are almost certainly in an AI bubble.

His concern centers on graphics processing units, the specialized chips that power AI training and inference. Griffin flagged the risk that GPU supply could eventually overshoot demand, which could trigger sharp price declines.

Griffin did not paint a picture of total collapse, though. He also noted that established players tend to prove resilient during downturns.

Blackstone’s money is where its mouth is

Gray is not offering a detached opinion. Blackstone has made AI infrastructure a central pillar of its strategy, which gives his comments both credibility and an obvious interest.

In August 2026, Blackstone and five other Wall Street firms committed to deploying more than $500 billion to finance AI infrastructure.

The firm also plans to lease a minimum of six gigawatts of capacity in 2026 across its fast-growing data-center platform.

Blackstone has also reported a 7x increase in spending on large language models among its portfolio companies. That figure matters because it speaks to usage, not just construction.

Why this debate matters beyond Wall Street

The bubble question has become one of the defining arguments in global markets. AI infrastructure now touches chipmakers, utilities, real estate owners, private credit lenders, and the largest tech companies on the planet.

For investors, the useful signals are fairly concrete. Watch whether hyperscaler capex keeps climbing from the $820 billion level Gray cited, or whether budgets start to flatten.

Watch GPU pricing and availability. A shift from scarcity to easy supply would be an early sign that Griffin’s oversupply scenario is taking shape.

Blackstone’s reported 7x jump in LLM spending across its portfolio is the kind of metric that supports Gray’s thesis. If adoption growth slows while construction keeps accelerating, the gap between the two camps narrows quickly.

There is also a credibility dynamic worth noting. Blackstone has billions riding on AI infrastructure, which means Gray’s optimism lines up neatly with his firm’s positioning. Griffin runs a trading-focused firm that can profit from volatility in either direction.

With Blackstone and five other firms pledging more than $500 billion, a growing share of AI infrastructure is being financed outside public markets. That spreads exposure across pension funds, insurers, and other institutional backers who invest through these vehicles.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Diego Almada Lopez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Harvard mathematicians debate whether AI proofs need human understanding after OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes claim

0

A machine may have produced a proof on one of math’s most famous open problems. Now mathematicians are asking whether anyone actually understands it.

In October 2026, Harvard mathematics faculty weighed in on that question. It follows OpenAI’s claim that an internal AI system had tackled parts of the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem. The faculty did not land in one place.

What OpenAI says it did

On September 8, 2026, OpenAI announced that a multi-agent AI system had addressed aspects of the Navier-Stokes problem. That problem is one of the Millennium Prize Problems named by the Clay Mathematics Institute.

The Navier-Stokes equations describe how fluids move. The open question is whether their solutions always stay well-behaved, or whether they can break down. That breakdown point is known as a singularity.

OpenAI says its system resolved two specific statements, labeled C and D, within the problem. The system allegedly built a proof involving a finite-time singularity scenario.

Around 10,000 AI agents ran at the same time for approximately 88 hours, starting around September 1, 2026. Those agents generated 2.7 million messages and approximately 130 billion output tokens.

OpenAI backed the claim with a 166-page report. It also formalized the work in Lean, a software tool that checks each logical step of a proof mechanically.

The company has said it is not pursuing the $1 million prize attached to the problem.

A priority fight and a fine-print problem

The announcement did not land quietly. NYU mathematician Tristan Buckmaster and Anthropic researcher Levent Alpöge had reported related developments hours before OpenAI went public.

The two accused OpenAI of drawing on their unpublished work. OpenAI denied any direct borrowing of data or prompts.

Buckmaster also alleged that OpenAI tried to exclude Alpöge from authorship discussions about the findings.

Expert reviews after the announcement suggested OpenAI’s proof may not extend to the unforced case. A forced formulation adds an outside push to the fluid. The unforced version, with no such push, is the case mathematicians have traditionally focused on.

As of late October 2026, experts noted the proof appears to rely on the forced formulation. The Clay Mathematics Institute is still reviewing the work.

The Harvard debate: correct versus understood

Some faculty acknowledged that AI could be effective at formalizing solutions. A machine that grinds through every case and has Lean verify each step can establish that something is true.

Others raised a sharper concern. A proof can show correctness without offering any deeper insight. If no person understands why the result holds, has mathematics actually advanced?

Professor Melanie Matchett Wood stressed that AI should complement human comprehension rather than replace it.

The interviews also showed a split on AI’s role in teaching. Faculty disagreed over how these tools should fit into instruction as well as research.

Why the understanding question is not academic hair-splitting

A 166-page machine-generated document, distilled from 2.7 million messages, may be verified without being digestible. If the reasoning is opaque, its techniques are harder for humans to reuse or build upon.

Verification tells you the answer is right. Understanding tells you what to do next.

What this means

For the math community, the immediate stakes sit with the Clay Mathematics Institute’s review. If experts confirm the proof only covers the forced case, the claimed breakthrough shrinks considerably.

For AI labs, the episode shows how messy credit gets when systems run at this scale. With around 10,000 agents and roughly 88 hours of compute, the Buckmaster and Alpöge dispute illustrates the difficulty of tracing which ideas came from where.

Lean formalization means correctness can increasingly be checked by machine. That pushes the human role toward explaining, interpreting and extracting insight from results that software has already certified.

Wood’s framing points at a likely path forward. In that model, AI systems handle the heavy computation and formal checking. Mathematicians do the work of making the result mean something.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Diego Almada Lopez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Monero (XMR) Soars 20% Weekly: Can It Repeat ZEC’s Explosion?

0

news

“The chart has a potential measured move towards $1,000,” one analyst stated.

While the broader cryptocurrency market has headed south today (October 22), the privacy coin XMR has extended its impressive rally. It currently trades just below $650, up 20% weekly and at its highest level since January.

Analysts are optimistic the uptrend is far from over, with some anticipating the asset will hit a new all-time high soon.

news How Much More?

XMR’s latest pump was likely fueled by an announcement coming from Monero. The team revealed on X that GUI v0.18.5.4 ‘Fluorine Fermi’ has been released. In a more detailed disclosure, it said the highlights of this minor upgrade include reopening testnet and stagenet wallets, along with bug fixes.

“This release was the direct result of 2 people who worked to put out 8 commits containing 38 new lines of code. We’d like to thank them very much for their time and effort. In no particular order, they are: selsta and tobtoht,” the team added.

Optimism is now running high, with numerous market observers calling for further gains. X user Sweep predicted that XMR will reach a new historical peak and possibly hit $1,000 in the coming months.

Shortly after, he applauded the asset for having “the best-looking chart right now.” He also reminded his followers of ZEC’s major rally earlier this year, suggesting XMR could repeat the pattern.

Alaoui Capital also issued a bullish forecast. The analyst identified a potential multi-year cup-and-handle structure on the token’s chart and claimed it could be on the verge of an ascent toward $1,000.

For his part, Crypto With Gopal argued that the privacy coin is breaking out of a rectangle pattern, with bulls pushing above the $630-$640 resistance zone after weeks of consolidation between $520 support and resistance.

You may also like:

“Momentum is heating up as buyers attempt to take control! A confirmed breakout could open the door toward $750. Watch for a successful retest to confirm strength. Bullish momentum is surging – breakout watch is ON,” he concluded.

news The Bearish Signals

Despite the overall expectations of a further rally, XMR’s exchange netflow serves as a warning that a cool-off may be on the way. According to CoinGlass, inflows have surpassed outflows over the past several days, suggesting investors have shifted from self-custody to centralized platforms, increasing immediate selling pressure.

business news XMR Exchange Netflow
XMR Exchange Netflow, Source: CoinGlass

Meanwhile, XMR’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has risen to almost 70. This means the asset is nearing overbought territory, which is typically seen as a pre-correction signal.

business news XMR RSI
XMR RSI, Source: RSI Hunter

In addition, Dr Profit recently cautioned that XMR’s open interest has reached a historic high and noted that the last time the OI jumped this much, the price crashed 66% in just 20 days.

It is important to mention that Santiment rejected that claim. According to the analytics platform, OI closed October 20 at around $198 million, marking the fifth-highest daily close of the past year.

DWF Labs finds Bitcoin ETF buyers follow trends, not set them

0

news

Spot Bitcoin ETF flows are some of the most closely watched numbers in crypto.

According to new research from DWF Labs, those tallies may be telling you where Bitcoin has been, not where it is going.

The firm’s analysis of US spot Bitcoin ETF flows found that daily net inflows and outflows mostly reflect earlier price movements. They do not act as reliable leading indicators of future returns. ETF investors, in other words, behave like trend followers: they buy into rallies and sell into dips.

news The numbers behind the trend

In the first half of 2026, spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $5.4 billion in net outflows.

That marks the first negative half-year since the products launched in January 2024. Cumulative inflows for Bitcoin ETFs had reached $56.6 billion at the start of 2026, so the first-half outflows put a dent in the total without erasing the larger picture.

BlackRock’s IBIT accounted for 99.6% of April inflows, essentially carrying the entire category that month on its own. IBIT then saw approximately $5 billion in net outflows across May and June.

The sharpest stretch came between May 15 and June 3. Bitcoin ETFs logged a record 13 consecutive trading days of outflows, a streak that pulled $4.4 billion from fund holdings.

news Not just a Bitcoin story

Spot ether ETFs also posted their first negative half, with net outflows of $1.47 billion over the same period.

Despite the red ink, DWF Labs said fundamentals in the digital asset sector remain strong, pointing to continued work on infrastructure and growing adoption.

news What this means for investors and traders

For traders, the most practical lesson is about signal quality. If ETF flows follow price, then reacting to a strong inflow day may mean buying after a large part of the move has already happened.

The concentration in IBIT is another point worth watching. When one fund accounts for 99.6% of a month’s inflows, its holders effectively set the tone for the whole category. Then roughly $5 billion left the same fund across two months.

A $5.4 billion half-year outflow, alongside $1.47 billion leaving ether ETFs, shows that ETF demand is not a one-way street. The products that helped bring crypto into traditional brokerage accounts can also become a fast exit when prices weaken.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

This Versatile Roborock Vacuum and Mop Is $750 Off Right Now

0

news


Pradershika Sharma

Pradershika Sharma

Freelance Writer

Experience

Pradershika Sharma is a tech deals writer for Lifehacker.

She has a Master’s degree in English Literature, a B.Ed., and a TESOL certification. She has been writing professionally since 2018, creating product reviews, affiliate articles, and search ads for global clients while working with Rubix Agency and Cognizant. Previously, she spent a year teaching English at the junior high level.

An avid reader since childhood, Pradershika’s idea of extreme sports is staying up to read “just one more chapter.” She lives in India.

Read Full Bio

October 22, 2026


Add as a preferred source on Google


Add as a preferred source on Google

We may earn a commission from links on this page.
Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

nature news Roborock Qrevo CurvX

Credit: Amazon/Lifehacker

Table of Contents


Homes with shedding pets, mixed flooring, and low furniture can quickly reveal the shortcomings of a basic robot vacuum. The Roborock Qrevo CurvX is built to handle those challenges, and it is currently available on Amazon for $749.99, down from $1,499.99. That is a $750 discount, and price trackers also indicate it is the lowest price recorded for this model. And while $750 is still a considerable amount to spend on a cleaning appliance, the discount brings it closer to midrange model pricing while retaining features normally associated with flagship machines.

The CurvX earns that higher price by doing more than simply vacuuming an open stretch of floor—its 22,000 pascals of suction can handle pet hair, crumbs, and debris caught in carpet, while the DuoDivide main brush guides hair toward the center to reduce tangles. There’s also an extendable side brush that reaches along walls and into corners, and a lifting chassis that helps the robot cross rugs, exercise mats, and other raised surfaces without getting stuck. Its mop pads are similarly adaptable, extending toward room edges for better coverage and lifting by up to 17 millimeters over carpet so the CurvX can move between hard floors and rugs without dragging a wet mop across both.

What do you think so far?

When it encounters low furniture, its top-mounted LiDAR sensor retracts to reduce the robot’s height to 3.14 inches, allowing it to clean beneath most sofas and beds. And once the CurvX finishes cleaning, its docking station takes care of much of the work that would otherwise fall to you—it empties the dustbin, refills the water tank, washes the mop pads with water heated to 176 degrees Fahrenheit, and dries them with air heated to 113 degrees. It also has a dirt sensor that can prompt it to wash its mop pads again or repeat a cleaning pass when an area needs more attention. The Roborock app gives you further control, allowing you to clean specific rooms, create schedules, set virtual barriers, and mark areas the robot should avoid, while SmartPlan 2.0 adapts the routine to different rooms and floor types.


Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now

Deals are selected by our commerce team


nature news Lifehacker Logo

Lifehacker has been a go-to source of tech help and life advice since 2005. Our mission is to offer reliable tech help and credible, practical, science-based life advice to help you live better.

© 2001-2026 Ziff Davis, LLC., A ZIFF DAVIS COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Lifehacker is a federally registered trademark of Ziff Davis and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission. The display of third-party trademarks and trade names on this site does not necessarily indicate
any affiliation or the
endorsement of Lifehacker. If you click an affiliate link and buy a product or service, we may be paid a fee by that merchant.

Read More

Birds are more afraid of women than men. Scientists have no idea why

0

Birds living in cities appear to react differently to men and women, and scientists are struggling to explain why. An international research team discovered that urban birds, including great tits, house sparrows, and blackbirds, tend to fly away sooner when approached by women than by men. The surprising behavior raises new questions about how birds perceive the people around them.

The study took place in five European countries, where male and female participants (matched for height and clothing) walked directly toward birds in city parks and other green spaces.

On average, men were able to approach about one meter closer than women before the birds flew away. The researchers measured this response by recording how close a person could get before a bird took flight (termed flight initiation distance).

Published in the British Ecological Society journal People and Nature, the findings showed the same pattern in Czechia, France, Germany, Poland, and Spain. The difference also appeared across all 37 bird species examined, including easily startled magpies and pigeons that typically allow people to approach much more closely.

Why Are Birds More Afraid of Women?

The researchers believe their findings indicate that city birds can distinguish between male and female humans. However, they have yet to determine which characteristics the birds recognize or why they appear more cautious around women.

Professor Daniel Blumstein of the University of California, Los Angeles, who helped conduct the research, said the results were convincing despite the lack of an explanation.

“I fully believe our results, that urban birds react differently based on the sex of the person approaching them, but I can’t explain them right now. We used bleeding-edge comparative analysis techniques that showed our findings were consistent across cities and species, but we simply don’t have a conclusive explanation yet.”

Dr. Yanina Benedetti of the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, another member of the research team, said the discovery challenged her expectations about how birds respond to human observers.

“As a woman in the field, I was surprised that birds reacted to us differently. This study highlights how animals in cities ‘see’ humans, which has implications for urban ecology and equality in science. Many behavioral studies assume that a human observer is neutral, but this wasn’t the case for urban birds in our study.”

What Are Birds Detecting in Humans?

Scientists have proposed several possible explanations for the difference. Birds might be responding to chemical signals such as pheromones, variations in body shape, or differences in how men and women walk. For now, however, these ideas remain speculative, and additional experiments will be needed to identify the actual cause.

Dr. Federico Morelli of the University of Turin, a co-author of the study, said the unanswered question is one of the discovery’s most fascinating aspects.

“This is maybe the most interesting part of our study,” said Dr. Federico Morelli from the University of Turin, a co-author of the study. “We have identified a phenomenon, but we really don’t know why. However, what our results do highlight is the birds’ sophisticated ability to evaluate their environment.”

The findings suggest that urban birds may be sensitive to human characteristics that people themselves rarely notice. Identifying those signals could help researchers better understand how wildlife assesses potential threats in environments shared with humans.

Dr. Benedetti said: “Urban birds clearly react to subtle cues that humans do not easily notice. Follow-up studies could focus on individual factors such as movement patterns, scent cues, or physical traits, testing them separately rather than grouping them under observer sex. This approach would help identify the specific cues birds detect.”

More Research Is Needed to Explain the Bird Behavior

Although the investigation included 2,701 observations, the researchers emphasize that their findings are still preliminary. Further studies will be necessary to establish whether the difference between birds’ responses to men and women consistently appears in other settings and populations.

For now, the discovery points to an intriguing possibility: Birds sharing our cities may be paying attention to subtle differences between people that scientists have yet to fully understand.

Read More

Oxford scientists discover how viruses build themselves without a blueprint

0

Researchers at the University of Oxford have observed virus-like particles assembling themselves one molecule at a time, uncovering the surprisingly simple rules that allow complex biological structures to form with remarkable reliability. The findings, published in Nature, offer a detailed look at a process that scientists have struggled to observe directly for decades.

Understanding how viruses construct their protective protein shells, and how that construction might be interrupted, could lead to new antiviral drugs, improved vaccines, and other medical treatments. The discovery helps explain how individual proteins consistently organize themselves into the correct structures despite having thousands of possible ways to connect.

The researchers found that viral assembly resembles navigating a complicated maze, where only certain paths lead to lasting progress. At first, protein components form weak connections that can easily break apart if the arrangement is unsuccessful. This flexibility allows the molecules to keep trying different combinations until they form particular closed structures. Once multiple connections hold these structures together, they become far more stable.

These stable arrangements serve as molecular checkpoints, narrowing the enormous number of possible assembly routes into a much smaller set of successful pathways. One especially important milestone occurs when five larger protein building blocks connect to form a closed pentagonal ring. This is the first highly stable structure in the assembly process. Once it forms, each subsequent stable stage requires fewer additional building blocks, allowing the particle to grow more quickly.

Co-lead author Dr. Roi Asor (Department of Chemistry and Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford) explained: “A virus has to solve an extraordinary construction problem. Its components somehow have to find the right arrangement among a huge number of possibilities, without a blueprint or machinery directing the process. We can now watch what happens molecule by molecule and see the physical rules that make it possible.”

Watching Virus Particles Assemble Molecule by Molecule

Viruses store and protect their genetic material within organized protein shells known as capsids. Depending on the virus, these shells may consist of tens or even thousands of individual protein components. Remarkably, in many cases, the proteins can arrange themselves into the correct structure without any external machinery directing their assembly.

Although scientists have investigated viral self-assembly for decades, capturing the process as it unfolds has been a major challenge. Many of the intermediate structures exist only briefly and appear in very small quantities. As a result, traditional methods have generally allowed researchers to examine the starting materials and finished particles without clearly showing how one transforms into the other.

To overcome this limitation, the Oxford researchers studied an engineered virus-like particle composed of 60 protein units. They used mass photometry, a technique developed at Oxford that determines the mass of individual molecules by measuring the light they scatter. By combining this technology with a new approach for keeping individual molecules confined and continuously observable, the team could repeatedly measure the mass of a growing particle as additional proteins attached.

This approach allowed the scientists to follow the construction process as it happened, effectively tracking the addition of individual molecular building blocks over time.

Co-first author PhD student Dan Loewenthal (Department of Chemistry and Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford) said: “This method lets us study the assembly process directly, we just take a video!”

Co-lead author Professor Philipp Kukura (Department of Chemistry and Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, Oxford University) said: “Until now, much of our understanding of how these structures assemble has had to be reconstructed from snapshots or theoretical models. Being able to both quantify the underlying interactions and follow one particle as it grows changes that. We can see the important intermediate structures appear and deduce a detailed model of the construction process.”

The Surprising Trick That Makes Viral Assembly Work

The results help explain how a process involving an overwhelming number of possible molecular arrangements can consistently produce the correct structure. Rather than exploring every possible route, the proteins progress through a relatively small number of stable intermediate stages that guide assembly toward completion.

The findings also clarify why the earliest stage of construction, called nucleation, is particularly difficult and why growth becomes substantially faster after the first stable structure appears.

A key part of this efficiency comes from the ability of protein building blocks to make mistakes without permanently disrupting the process. Weak initial connections allow incorrect combinations to separate, giving the proteins another opportunity to find a better arrangement. When enough components eventually connect in the correct closed configuration, the resulting structure becomes stable enough to support further growth.

Dr. Asor added: “The weak interactions give the system room to make mistakes. Most encounters don’t have to be successful: the components can separate and try again. But once enough of them come together in the right closed arrangement, the structure becomes stable, and assembly can move forward. That combination of trial and error followed by locking in successful structures is what makes the process so reliable.”

New Possibilities for Antiviral Drugs and Vaccines

By identifying the molecular interactions that control viral assembly, scientists may eventually be able to develop treatments that interfere with the construction of viral protein shells. The same insights could also support efforts to engineer virus-like particles for vaccines and other therapeutic applications.

Co-author Dr. Jack Tan (MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine and CAMS-Oxford Institute) noted: “The ability to understand these processes at the molecular level could have important applications in vaccine development and antivirals that disrupt viral assembly.”

The implications may extend far beyond viruses. Self-assembly is essential throughout biology, helping create everything from the internal skeletons of cells to specialized molecular compartments and large protein complexes.

By making it possible to observe these intricate construction processes one molecule at a time, the Oxford team’s approach offers researchers a powerful new way to investigate how complex biological structures emerge from relatively simple interactions.

Read More

A revolutionary new microscope could reveal the hidden machinery of life

0

Almost a century ago, a breakthrough in microscopy gave scientists an entirely new way to examine the inside of cells. Known as phase contrast, the technique made previously faint or nearly invisible cellular structures much easier to distinguish. Its importance was recognized with a Nobel Prize in 1953.

Now, physicists at the University of California, Berkeley, have brought that same principle to electron microscopy, a technology capable of magnifying objects roughly 10,000 times more than conventional light microscopes.

The researchers have developed a device called a laser phase plate that could significantly improve cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM). This powerful imaging method has transformed the study of protein structures and helped speed up drug discovery over the past decade. Even so, it has a major limitation: Most human proteins are so small that obtaining clear images of them remains extremely difficult.

The new laser technology could help overcome that obstacle, potentially allowing scientists to image proteins as small as one-third the size of those that challenge current microscopes.

An even greater impact could come from improvements to cryoelectron tomography (cryo-ET). This newer approach combines images captured from multiple angles to construct three-dimensional views of proteins and other molecules. Unlike techniques that study isolated molecules in a solution, cryo-ET can reveal how proteins are arranged and interact within their natural cellular surroundings.

“Cryo-EM has become the new, fastest-growing method for resolving the structure of biological macromolecules, and cryo-ET is expected to show how these molecules work together in their natural, cellular context,” said Holger Müller, a UC Berkeley professor of physics and faculty scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory who led the development effort. “But because of signal-to-noise limitations, the majority of human and animal proteins are too small to be analyzed by these methods. The increase in signal-to-noise ratio provided by this laser phase plate is expected to overcome these important limitations.”

An Extraordinary Laser Reveals Hidden Cellular Structures

The breakthrough relies on what the researchers describe as the world’s most intense focused continuous-wave laser. Rather than simply illuminating a specimen, the laser interacts directly with the microscope’s electron beam, altering its phase to increase image contrast.

This adjustment makes it easier to distinguish small molecules, including hemoglobin, from their surroundings. It could also improve the visibility of structures inside cells, such as the nucleus and mitochondria.

“With cryo-ET, we’re looking at small, very complicated cellular material that’s incredibly crowded inside the cell,” said Bridget Carragher, founding technical director of imaging at Biohub in Redwood City, California. “It’s like a forest of trees, and you’re trying to find one leaf on one tree in there. Cryo-ET needs a dramatic step forward in contrast, so we can start to see what’s going on inside the cell. That’s what the laser phase plate promises to give us.”

With financial support from Biohub, Müller acquired an advanced cryo-EM instrument and equipped it with the new laser phase plate. He named the resulting microscope Theia, after the ancient Greek Titaness associated with light and radiance.

Meanwhile, Carragher is directing the construction of a related microscope at Biohub’s imaging facility in Redwood City. Her team’s instrument uses two lasers rather than one, building on theoretical research conducted by Müller and his collaborators.

The two laser beams are arranged at right angles to one another and each operates at approximately half the power. This configuration helps prevent components from burning out while also reducing optical distortions that could interfere with image quality.

Both research teams are working with Thermo Fisher Scientific, the leading manufacturer of cryo-EM instruments.

“Theia is the Formula 1 microscope,” Müller said. “It has extra electron optics that give it better resolution than the standard cryo-EM, even without the laser. With the addition of the laser phase plate, we hope that it really becomes the world’s best instrument overall.”

The Berkeley team’s latest images and technical findings are presented in the journal Science. Details of Biohub’s two-laser design are available in a recently posted preprint.

How a Nobel Prize-Winning Discovery Changed Microscopy

To understand why the new technology matters, it helps to look at a longstanding challenge in biological imaging.

Because plant and animal cells consist largely of water, they are relatively transparent when viewed under an ordinary light microscope. Although this transparency might seem beneficial, it creates a problem. Small cellular structures, including mitochondria and nuclei, scatter very little light and therefore appear only slightly darker than the surrounding material.

Scientists have traditionally addressed this problem by adding stains to create greater contrast. However, staining also kills the cells.

In 1930, Dutch physicist Frits Zernike realized that light passing through biological material changes in more ways than simply becoming brighter or dimmer. When light scatters inside a cell, it also experiences a tiny delay that changes its phase, or the timing of its wave peaks.

Although the human eye cannot directly detect this phase shift, Zernike discovered that it could be converted into a visible difference in brightness. By shifting the phase of the unscattered light by 90 degrees, he made subtle cellular features stand out more clearly against their background when the light reached the viewer’s eye.

This innovation became the foundation of phase-contrast microscopy, earning Zernike the 1953 Nobel Prize in Physics.

By the early 1940s, scientists had already recognized how useful phase contrast was for studying cells. They began exploring whether the same idea might improve electron microscopes, which use electrons instead of light to examine structures as small as individual proteins.

Unfortunately, early attempts encountered serious technical difficulties. Devices designed to alter the phase of electron beams often weakened the beam too much, introduced image instability, or reduced resolution.

A possible solution emerged in 2010, when Müller and Robert Glaeser, now a UC Berkeley professor emeritus of molecular and cell biology, proposed using an intense laser to produce the necessary phase shift. Their approach offered a way to improve contrast without sacrificing electron beam intensity.

Overcoming the Limits of Electron Microscopy

Glaeser has played an important role in developing cryo-EM, which offers a potentially simpler way to determine molecular structures than traditional X-ray crystallography.

X-ray crystallography requires researchers to grow crystals of the molecules they want to study and obtain access to an intense X-ray source. Cryo-EM avoids the need to crystallize molecules, but it presents difficulties of its own.

One of the biggest problems is that an electron beam can heat and eventually damage the specimen being examined. This limits how much information can be collected and how detailed the resulting images can become. Covering specimens with metal can reduce damage and improve contrast, but it also makes the images less sharp.

During the 1960s, researchers began investigating whether freezing biological samples could protect them from radiation damage.

Glaeser demonstrated that cooling specimens helped preserve them during imaging. He also proposed using a less intense electron beam to examine thousands of frozen molecules at once, further limiting the damage.

Because the molecules would be positioned at different angles, computers could analyze and combine their images to reconstruct a highly detailed molecular structure.

These advances helped establish the foundations of modern cryo-EM, whose developers received the 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. During their acceptance remarks, the Nobel laureates acknowledged Glaeser’s contributions.

The Nobel Committee praised the technology, explaining that cryo-EM “both simplifies and improves the imaging of biomolecules. This method has moved biochemistry into a new era.”

A 15-Year Quest to Harness an Exceptionally Powerful Laser

Turning the laser phase plate concept into working technology required years of engineering.

Following their 2010 proposal, Müller spent 15 years pursuing the idea, with part of the research supported by the National Institutes of Health.

The first major challenge was generating an extraordinarily intense laser beam concentrated into a tiny area. The researchers needed enough light intensity to change the phase of an electron beam by 90 degrees.

It took a decade to develop the necessary system.

Their solution was to confine a continuous laser beam inside a spherical chamber lined with mirrors. As the light repeatedly reflected through the cavity more than 10,000 times, its intensity increased dramatically while the beam became focused into an extremely small spot.

“It’s 75 kilowatts focused to a few microns,” Müller said. “That’s more powerful than what you use for welding. It’s more power than a military laser. It builds up the brightest continuous laser focus ever.”

The team first demonstrated that the concept worked by installing a laser phase plate in one of Glaeser’s older electron microscopes.

Additional funding from Biohub then made it possible to acquire a customized, state-of-the-art Thermo Fisher Krios cryo-EM microscope and modify it to accommodate the laser technology.

In their latest research, the scientists tested the upgraded microscope using six different samples that varied in size and preparation method. The laser consistently improved image resolution, with particularly important gains for specimens that are difficult to image using standard methods.

“For the most challenging cases — small particles, bad specimens — the laser produces a very considerable advantage,” Müller said.

Sharper Images of Proteins Once Too Small to Study

To demonstrate the new microscope’s capabilities, the researchers reconstructed images of two different proteins.

The first was aldolase, a protein found in muscle that modern cryo-EM systems can already image relatively easily. The second was hemoglobin, the protein responsible for carrying oxygen through the bloodstream.

Hemoglobin is much smaller and lies near the lower size limit of proteins that conventional cryo-EM instruments can reliably analyze.

Using the laser phase plate, the researchers improved the resolution of both protein structures. The improvement was especially pronounced for hemoglobin, highlighting the technology’s potential to overcome the difficulties associated with smaller molecules.

“The bottom line is, if you have a large protein and a really good sample — a fresh one or one frozen without bubbles, for example — you may not need the phase plate to get a single, high-quality image. But for a small protein and a bad sample, laser-on is best,” Müller said. “This could fill an enormous gap in our knowledge of protein structures that can’t be crystallized or are too small for today’s cryo-EM. And it will be revolutionary for cryo-ET.”

Protein mass is typically expressed in daltons, a unit named after English chemist John Dalton. One dalton is defined as one-twelfth the mass of a carbon-12 atom.

Conventional cryo-EM struggles to image proteins smaller than approximately 70 kilodaltons. That limitation is particularly significant because proteins below this threshold account for about 90% of the human proteome, the complete collection of proteins produced by the human body.

With the laser phase plate, researchers can now image proteins as small as 50 kilodaltons, although doing so remains challenging. Such proteins are even smaller than hemoglobin.

The Next Goal Is to Reveal Even Smaller Proteins

Müller believes the technology could eventually allow scientists to study proteins as small as 17 kilodaltons (the size of the protein myoglobin).

Reaching that goal may require another improvement: using a tightly focused electron beam rather than the defocused beam currently needed to produce sufficient contrast without the laser phase plate.

According to Müller, the laser system should make it possible to obtain contrast directly from phase changes in a focused electron beam.

If successful, this adjustment could double the contrast and signal-to-noise ratio again, adding to the improvement already achieved with the laser phase plate.

Such progress could make it possible to study a far larger proportion of the body’s proteins and provide unprecedented insight into how they interact within the complex environment of cells.

“This technology is a step function change for biology,” said Stephani Otte, Biohub’s Vice President of Imaging Science. “We are going to be able to see how molecular machines operate inside the living cell, in context, for the first time. What was once invisible will become visible — and that changes everything about how we understand disease.”

The Berkeley research team also includes Glaeser; postdoctoral fellows and co-first authors Petar Petrov and Jessie Zhang; staff scientist Jonathan Remis; postdoctoral fellow Hang Cheng; and current and former physics graduate students Jeremy Axelrod, Eric Cooper, Ian Hicklin, Shahar Sandhaus, and Cooper Schnurr.

At Biohub, Carragher and David Agard, the organization’s founding scientific director of imaging, jointly lead the Dynamic Structural Cell Biology group. Both are co-corresponding authors of the Biohub preprint, alongside Biohub engineer Pavel Olshin.

Read More

Job-Based Health Plan Costs Rise, With Little Relief in Sight

0

news

Increasing health care expenses aren’t an issue simply for those who purchase their own medical insurance. Boosts struck companies and their employees this year, too, and more are anticipated for 2027 strategies– contributing to growing issues about price heading into the midterm elections.

Surveys reveal that health care expenses — and pricein basic– are amongst leading issues pointed out by most likely citizens. Much attention has actually been concentrated on installing expenses and decreasing registration in Affordable Care Act prepares, the insurance coverage utilized by approximately 19 million individuals who purchase their own. Work-based strategies are including monetary pressure for the more than 150 million Americans covered through their tasks.

Among the most significant modifications this year, for example, was available in the quantity employees pay towards their own protection, increasing approximately 9% to $7,471 every year for a household, according to a broad yearly study launched Oct. 22 by KFF, a health info not-for-profit that consists of KFF Health News. That’s up from the 7.6% dive seen from 2024 to 2025.

Their companies, too, dealt with extra expenses, with the typical household protection premium increasing 5% to strike $28,303, according to the study.

In reaction to that boost– which begins the heels of a 6% boost the previous year– 44% of big companies, with a minimum of 200 staff members, stated they upped what employees needed to pay towards protection.

“When we begin to see greater usage or greater costs, there are just a minimal variety of things companies can do” to attempt to sluggish premium boosts, stated Matthew Rae, associate director of the Program on the Health Care Marketplace at KFF.

Companies reported taking other actions in the previous year to hold down their expenses, such as increasing deductibles (the quantities individuals pay towards their care before insurance coverage pitches in), altering insurance companies, including preapproval for some services, or providing employees a narrower option of doctor, the KFF report stated.

Employees’ revenues increased approximately 3.7% this year, the study discovered, while total inflation was 2.7%.

Individuals who work for little business, with less than 200 staff members, paid more for health care than their equivalents at bigger business.

Health strategies at big business had a $1,772 typical yearly deductible for a specific staff member, while little offices balanced $2,624.

In general, however, the share employees pay towards the overall premium throughout all business ticked up just somewhat from the previous year, striking 27% of the expense for household protection and 18% for specific protection, with companies getting the rest.

Increasing Expenses

Other groups have actually just recently published forecasts of what companies may deal with next year.

Consulting company AONfor instance, forecasted companies might pay 9.5% more next year, the 4th successive year of huge boosts, while a comparable business, Marsh, approximated 8.2%the greatest dive considering that 2003. Expenses are increasing for numerous factors, from individuals making use of more services to escalating rates of prescription drugs and quickly increasing healthcare facility rates, the reports state.

Assisting drive up expenses is synthetic intelligence, state other reports, consisting of one from the Business Group on Healtha subscription company of self-insured companies. The report stated health center systems and other medical companies utilize the innovation to make the most of insurance provider and client billing.

Business group anticipated an average premium boost of 9.2% next year, Companies may decrease that by making advantage modifications.

Up until just recently, companies soaked up the lion’s share of boost, “however that’s beginning to alter a bit,” stated Jim Winkler, primary method officer for the group. “When open registration begins, the majority of people will see their out-of-paycheck expenses and most likely their out-of-pocket costs increasing.”

Looking ahead, the group recommends companies take additional action to avert boosts in 2028, Winkler stated. One concept is to provide lower copayments for some health service providers based upon their rates or quality, comparable to “tiered networks,” a technique companies and insurance companies have actually attempted, with just 4% of business staying with it, according to the KFF study. “What’s old is brand-new once again,” Winkler kept in mind, stating it may work much better now since it’s much easier than ever for apps to reveal customers the companies with the most affordable copayments, which would be set by a company or insurance company.

Ignored in much of the conversation on increasing health expenses, stated Elizabeth Mitchellpresident and CEO of the big company Purchaser Business Group on Health, is the function played by the health care market– from healthcare facilities to drugmakers to insurance companies.

She asked: Why are the consumers– the companies, in this case– being asked what they are doing about it? “The market is doing definitely nothing to manage expenses, as evidenced by the unrelenting development in expenses,” she stated.

Services are utilizing brand-new prices info provided under federal guidelines to contract straight in many cases with medical facilities and other service providers and to purchase medical care.

Mitchell and others state Congress needs to likewise get included. Health policy scientists at Georgetown University, for instance, recommend topping yearly deductibles, setting healthcare facility cost caps, and extending lower drug rates worked out by Medicare to the economic sector.

Keeping Costs Flat

Not all business saw a boost this year.

Take KFF study participant Phifer Inc.a business based in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, that makes insect screens and accuracy woven items, such as outside furnishings material. Its health expenses stayed flat this year, most likely due to the fact that it has actually put a strong focus in the last few years on offering zero-cost medical care to its employees through on-site centers and direct agreements with physicians’ workplaces, stated Russell DuBose, the business’s vice president of personnels.

Just 7% of business in the KFF study reported having an on-site center, although 24% stated they had one on-site or close-by.

Employees get in rapidly to see a medical care physician, DuBose stated, which can assist with both avoidance of illness and capturing issues early. The business likewise straight agreements with other kinds of experts.

“We guide strategy members to the very best service providers that we can discover,” DuBose stated. “When we do that, we’re paying a more affordable cost.”

The business is self-insured, like lots of companies. That implies it pays all the costs itself and purchases what’s called stop-loss insurance coverage to aid with really high expenses. That protection has actually likewise leapt in rate, DuBose stated.

He frequently gets calls from other companies inquiring about his business’s technique– and how to manage expenses. Now, much more so than over the last few years, he stated, companies fidget, anxious about expenses continuing to increase and what that would suggest.

“The concern is ‘Could the increasing expense of health care be the next task killer?'” he stated.

To name a few findings from the yearly KFF report:

  • Twenty-nine percent of all business surveyed stated covering GLP-1s, a brand-new class of weight reduction drug, had a “considerable” result on their drug expenses.
  • Numerous business– about 29% of big ones– reported trouble getting info on just how much their strategies spent for healthcare or cost contrasts amongst suppliers.
  • About 9% of business with 50 or more employees purchase prescription drugs from outside the U.S. to conserve cash.

‘Go to Canada’: Trump Touted Americans’ Access to Cheaper Drugs. A New Rule Threatens It.

0

Days before it was to enter into result, the Trump administration pressed back a U.S. custom-mades guideline threatening the supply of essential prescription drugs imported by countless Americans.

Under the guideline, Customs and Border Protection and the FDA will need coding on bundles that makes it much easier to understand what’s in them. It is targeted at gathering tariffs on even low-value imports, and at capturing controlled substances like fentanyl. It will likewise include expenses and complicated documents to each order.

Now the policy, which was set to begin Oct. 22, is postponed till Jan. 20.

While it is unlawful to import most FDA-approved prescription drugs, the U.S. has actually enabled Americans to import legal medications in little amounts for individual usage given that 2003. The FDA seldom examines the parcels.

“The info we have exists’s going to be a total shutdown on Oct. 22,” Tim Smith, basic supervisor of the Canadian International Pharmacy Association, stated in an interview in early October. The 51 certified retail drug stores in his company advised their numerous countless U.S. consumers to submit additional orders before Oct. 9 to be sure as lots of medications as possible gotten here before the clampdown, Smith stated.

“These are individuals in every case who have actually gone to the medical professional, gotten a prescription for whatever, gone to the drug store to fill the order, seen how pricey it’s going to be, and after that tried to find an option,” he stated. “Those are individuals who’ve been concerning us for several years.”

As Donald Trump campaigned in 2016, permitting individuals to import drugs became part of his platform. In his very first term, President Trump let states purchase less expensive drugs from Canada. He informed Floridians at 2020 rallies that their state might “go to Canada” to acquire drugs for them.

While Florida and Colorado signed up with the importation program, neither state has actually brought in any drugs.

Clients have, nevertheless, and they flooded authorities with a minimum of 109,000 letters prompting the FDA to clarify that the guideline will not stop personal-use drug deliveries, stated Ken Hunter, executive director of the Campaign for Personal Prescription Importation. And Trump ally Laura Loomer called the guideline a case of stupidity or sabotage, under a heading that asked, “So Why Is Someone in His Administration Trying To Make Prescription Drugs More Expensive Before The Midterms?”

Seventy-one congressional Democrats signed an Oct. 1 petition led by Reps. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois and Mark Pocan of Wisconsin to alert about the prospective effect of the guideline. 3 House Republicans from Florida composed individually to CBP and the FDA, keeping in mind that Floridians, unlike Americans in Northern states, can’t quickly drive to Canada to purchase medication.

By cutting off imports, Hunter stated, “they are going to lose millions, possibly billions in tariff income.”

“Why would you wish to cut off this huge profits source?” he asked. “Why would they wish to cut individuals off from lifesaving medications 2 weeks before midterms?”

Pressure by advocacy groups might have led the company to withdraw, stated Lucia Mueller, president of PharmacyChecker, which assists clients discover genuine drug stores to get less expensive drugs.

“Loomer’s political argument is sound,” she informed KFF Health News. “We understand she’s had Trump’s ear before.”

The company’s Oct. 14 press release on the hold-up stated it would assist “prevent disturbances to specific worldwide postal deliveries.” It didn’t particularly describe drug imports.

“This is a crucial short-term success,” stated Gabriel Levitt, creator of Prescription Justice, a not-for-profit that supporters for more-affordable drugs. “However, the underlying hazard to individual prescription drug importation stays, and the next 90 days will be crucial.”

A 2020 research study discovered that 2.3 million Americans routinely imported medications from abroad, and some studies reveal much greater numbers. About 4 in 10 Americans in a current KFF study stated expense had actually led them to not take medications as recommended over the previous year.

When he was detected with atrial fibrillation years back, Leslie Waters found out that a 90-day supply of the blood thinner Eliquis, or apixaban, would cost $486. “Holy crap!” stated the retired computer system researcher, who stated he lives off a month-to-month $1,886 Social Security check. Waters, of San Jose, California, learnt more about the Canada choice on the web and has actually been purchasing 90-day products from a drug store there for $57, consisting of shipping.

Under previous administrations, orders worth $800 or less weren’t taxed or burdened comprehensive documentation. The brand-new guideline will need carriers of even low-value global parcels to send in-depth info about their contents to CBP, together with tariff payments, which need to be transferred through a certified client broker.

Zonos, a U.S.-based business that manages logistics for mail from Canada and other nations, informed customers in early September that its understanding was that CBP would no longer allow individual prescription drug plans after the guideline worked, stated Smith, of the Canadian drug store trade group. In an Oct. 6 webinar, Zonos senior broker Angela Macke stated that the business would continue to deliver the drugs however that it didn’t understand whether the firms would let them reach clients.

The drug store statements have actually terrified countless consumers, stated Bill Hepscher, whose business, Canadian Medstore, has 6 Florida stores that assist clients import drugs.

“It’s truly been hair on fire,” he stated. “I could invest my whole day fielding call from individuals stating: ‘Can I no longer get my Eliquis? I might have an embolism or stroke!'”

Hepscher stated about half his customers purchase their drugs from Canada, with a number of the others purchasing from Australia, New Zealand, the U.K., or Turkey. He stated 2025 was his business’s busiest year ever– modifications to Medicare drug strategies and increased registration in high-deductible Affordable Care Act strategies had actually led elders and more youthful individuals dealing with greater expenses and copays to look for Canadian drugs.

“I just have 23 days’ worth of tablets,” Roland Hofferber informed KFF Health News in early October. The retired supply chain engineer in Muscatine, Iowa, takes Jardiance, likewise referred to as empagliflozin, to slow his persistent kidney illness. “If I do not get some through quite quickly, I’m going to need to cut down or stop.”

The drug would cost him $641 for 3 months in the U.S., he stated. He purchases a generic from an Indian drug store for $54.

The FDA “hasn’t provided criteria regarding what they will authorize and what they will not,” Zonos’ Macke stated throughout the webinar. “We’ve been informed there will not be a basic restriction. We can not assure U.S. clients. We need to see how FDA uses. They might be lax. They might be extremely rigorous.”

When asked whether clients might still import prescription medications, CBP representative Jessica Turner stated that pharmaceuticals stayed under the FDA’s jurisdiction which the FDA “will continue to figure out whether imported medication deliveries are acceptable.” Department of Health and Human Services representative Emily Hilliard stated the FDA would “continue to assess individual imports on a case-by-case basis.”

White House representative Allison Schuster did not react to concerns about imports however stated Trump “stays devoted to decreasing the expense of prescription drugs.”

Because summertime 2025, clients have actually needed to pay tariffs on brand-name medication deliveries. In 2022, the FDA stated it normally inspected about 1 in 2,000 medication bundles travelling through U.S. custom-mades.

“A great deal of items weren’t even took a look at, due to the fact that CBP and FDA didn’t have complete presence” into what went into the nation, Prescription Justice’s Levitt stated. The guideline needs carriers to publish a bond and fill in an intricate information kind for each bundle, he kept in mind.

“Let’s state you’re importing 90 days’ worth of Eliquis,” Levitt stated. “FDA can now search a screen and see that. Do they let it in, or decline it under law?”

“If they do not, there’s going to be a friend of individuals who can not manage their drugs any longer,” he stated. “And those individuals are going to suffer.”

Trump Dangles Rural Health Dollars To Push States To Change Hospital Laws

0

The Trump administration has hinged federal funding for states on whether they end or loosen powerful but controversial laws that regulate the construction of new hospitals — with a handful of states poised to comply.

A chunk of the $50 billion available to states through the five-year Rural Health Transformation Program is partly contingent on policy commitments. The administration told states it would score their applications higher if they walked back their certificate of need, or CON, laws, which give a state approval authority over the expansion or construction of any healthcare facility. Six states indicated plans to revisit their laws in their applications.

Certificate of need laws, which require that a healthcare provider prove a community need for a new service, were intended to curb monopolies and rising costs. But critics of the laws say they’ve instead raised healthcare prices, stalled needed facilities, and barred rural patients from new technology. More than 30 states, plus Washington, D.C., enforce some sort of certificate of need law, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Legislators in several states have been pushing to end the laws, which have faced scrutiny for decades — under Republican and Democratic administrations. But the Trump administration’s aggressive approach to tie the policies to funding has forced states to reckon with their laws quickly.

The Rural Health Transformation Program was added to President Donald Trump’s signature One Big Beautiful Bill Act as an initiative to modernize healthcare in remote areas. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, in its notice to states applying to the program, called certificate of need laws “an additional expense and burden on rural facilities” and explained how states with fewer certificate of need rules would get higher scores.

“It’s not the first time the federal government used funding as a state carrot (versus using a stick) to encourage alignment on an administration’s policy goal,” Maureen Hensley-Quinn, a researcher at the National Academy for State Health Policy, said in an email. She noted that President Barack Obama’s administration included millions of dollars in performance bonuses for states that made it easier for children to enroll in federally funded health insurance.

Hensley-Quinn said the funding “carrot” was an opportunity to take a hard look at whether policies like certificates of need were truly worth it.

“States need to carefully weigh the trade-offs of supporting a ‘voluntary’ federal policy no matter what,” she said, “and additional federal financing, especially in tight state budget years, can tip the scale.”

Obama, Trump on Same Page

Since the Rural Health Transformation Program became law last year, Tennessee has taken the most concrete action. In a bipartisan vote in April, state lawmakers passed a bill that will unravel most of its remaining certificate of need rules over the next four years. Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, and Mississippi have also said they would consider ending or loosening their laws.

“If there’s an issue where you can have President Obama and President Trump in agreement on something, that tells you the idea probably has some merit,” Wes Climer, a Republican state senator in South Carolina, said in 2021, supporting the repeal of that state’s certificate of need law. The legislature voted in 2023 to end most rules in the law, and in January it will stop requiring certificate of need applications for new hospital construction or expansion, leaving them only for nursing homes.

Some certificate of need laws require approval for changes as minor as a new piece of expensive equipment. In North Carolina, a hospital that won a certificate of need to build a much-needed facility was mired in a court battle for three years before breaking ground in 2026.

medical A photo of a construction site. A tarp is draped over the fence surrounding the site. It has AdventHealth Weaverville's logo on it.
Hospital construction underway in Weaverville, North Carolina, in October. The project had been delayed three years, tied up in the state’s certificate of need process. (Andrew Jones/KFF Health News)

As more states consider removing their certificate of need laws, Hensley-Quinn warns of unintended consequences: Fewer records will exist that help states track hospital ownership.

Hensley-Quinn said frustrated state officials have come to her years after their states repealed certificate of need laws, saying that even with a licensure process, they don’t have insight into the financial state of their health systems or facilities, or how they’re managed. Certificate of need laws force companies seeking a new foothold in the state to submit voluminous applications. Once the laws are gone, few regulations force transparency. That leaves states unaware when a health system contracts with private equity to provide hospital services, for example.

“Without CON, without ownership reporting, and without an entity that monitors transactions or providers in that way, there’s no way for you to know,” Hensley-Quinn said.

Tennessee’s Certificate of Need Law

Tennessee lawmakers had pushed to change the state’s certificate of need law for years but didn’t pass sweeping legislation until it faced losing out on federal funding. Like all states, Tennessee is set to receive an equal share of half of the Rural Health Transformation Program’s grants, while the other $25 billion in funding is contingent on other factors, including states’ policy commitments.

In 2024, the state’s hospital association opposed a repeal effort in a letter penned by 12 hospital and health system leaders, many serving rural areas, though that more limited legislation passed anyway.

A repeal would harm vulnerable patients by driving up costs and thinning existing hospital staff, said Martin Chaney, CEO of Maury Regional Health, a system in rural Middle Tennessee south of Nashville. Ending the law would create rural healthcare deserts, Chaney wrote in the letter, because hospitals would choose to expand in areas that were already the most profitable, where residents had a range of health insurance providers.

“The premise that eliminating CON regulations will expand health care opportunities by increasing competition is not true for ALL Tennesseans,” Chaney wrote. “Instead, it would result in cherry-picking and increasing the gap in access to medical care in rural areas.”

A month later, TriStar Health — owned by the largest hospital company in the U.S., for-profit HCA Healthcare — applied for a certificate of need to build a hospital just 20 minutes north of Maury Regional Medical Center. Nashville-based HCA received approval despite brief opposition from Maury Regional Health, the system led by Chaney.

HCA did not respond to requests for comment.

Local leaders are divided on what the new hospital would do to healthcare in the region. “Competition is good,” Maury County Commissioner Kevin Markham told KFF Health News. Markham, like many in favor of the new hospital, said that patients should have options when it comes to choosing where they get hospital care.

But leaders of smaller hospital systems in Tennessee are worried. Judy Herbert, a Williamson County commissioner and board member at Williamson Health, another health system in the area, said ending certificate of need laws will prompt hospital closures. Big hospital systems will become the default for expensive procedures and dominate rural markets, while smaller hospitals that provided those procedures before will lose so much money, they’ll be forced to shutter or sell, Herbert reasoned, echoing the concerns of other advocates of the laws.

“Many challenges have emerged that place increasing pressure on healthcare organizations, especially independent nonprofits like Williamson Health,” that health system’s leadership said in an open letter in July 2025, citing Tennessee’s intentions around certificates of need.

In July of this year, Williamson Health’s board voted to sell its network of clinics, diagnostic centers, and a more than 330-bed hospital in a $900 million deal with Ascension St. Thomas, part of one of the largest healthcare systems in the nation.

Tom Lee Says Bitmine Will Stop Buying ETH at 5% of Supply

0

Bitmine is approaching completion of among the biggest business ethereum build-up projects on record. Chairman Tom Lee states the business will stop purchasing as soon as it reaches 5% of ETH supply, a ceiling he stated was motivated by Vitalik Buterin.

Secret Takeaways

  • Bitmine is nearing its 5% ETH supply cap after building up about 6 million ETH in simply over a year.
  • The business has actually staked approximately 86.5% of its treasury, moving focus from purchasing to efficient ETH usage.
  • As soon as Bitmine stops purchasing, ETF circulations and staking need will matter more for ethereum’s next stage.

Bitmine Is 100,000 ETH Away From Buying Goal

Bitmine’s ruthless ethereum purchasing spree is nearly over.

Speaking at TOKEN2049Tom Lee stated the business has actually enforced a difficult cap of 5% of ethereum’s overall supply and will stop building up ETH when that limit is reached.

Bitmine holds approximately 6 million ETH, 4.9% of supply, at the time of Lee’s remarks. He stated the business requires just about 100,000 ETH more to reach its target.

“We stated we have a 5% tough cap. We’re not going to own more than 5% of ethereum,” Lee stated. “That’s something that Vitalik type of asked us to stop at 5%.”

A Five-Year Plan Finished in Just Over a Year

The speed of Bitmine’s build-up has actually stood out.

Lee stated the business initially anticipated the method to take around 5 years. Rather, it reached 4.9% of ethereum’s supply in simply over a year.

“We believed this would take 5 years. It took us a little over a year,” Lee stated. “More notably, we did this all in the middle of a bearish market.”

Bitmine purchased strongly while ETH rates were depressed, consisting of significant purchases around $1,500, according to Lee. The business’s method has actually turned it into among the most focused business holders of ethereum in the crypto market.

Bitmine Keeps Buying as the Finish Line Nears

The business has actually continued including ETH even as it approaches the cap.

On Oct. 19, Bitmine included another 12,535 ETH, raising overall holdings to 6,041,481 ETH, then worth almost $14.5 billion.

2 days later on, the business staked another 159,728 ETH, worth approximately $390.6 million.

That pressed the share of Bitmine’s treasury released into staking to about 86.5%, revealing that the method is significantly concentrated on making its ETH efficient instead of merely holding it.

What Happens After Bitmine Stops Buying?

The looming end of Bitmine’s purchases matters since its need has actually been among the most consistent institutional quotes in ethereum. When the 5% ceiling is reached, that purchasing pressure vanishes.

For ETH financiers, the concern ends up being whether exchange-traded fund (ETF) need, staking development, and wider institutional adoption can change Bitmine as a limited purchaser.

Lee likewise highlighted Bitmine’s addition in the Russell 1000, arguing that its stock uses organizations a direct listed-market path into ethereum direct exposure.

Bitmine might will stop purchasing ETH, however its impact on ethereum’s institutional story is not likely to end there.

Coinbase Ireland Fined €3.25M After Customer Fund Safeguard Lapses

0

news

Ireland’s reserve bank has actually fined Coinbase Ireland EUR3.25 million after discovering that the business stopped working to effectively safeguard client funds over numerous years. Mistakes in its systems left a designated customer-funds account brief by as much as EUR5.2 million in 2024. Coinbase states no consumers lost cash or access to their funds, and the issues have actually been dealt with.

news Secret Takeaways

  • Coinbase Ireland deals with a EUR3.25 million fine over failures to secure client funds.
  • Coinbase Ireland’s designated protecting account had deficiencies reaching EUR5.2 million in 2024.
  • Coinbase states no clients lost cash, and the business has actually fixed the issues.

news Coinbase Ireland Hit With EUR3.25 M Fine Over Customer Fund Failures

Coinbase Ireland has actually been fined EUR3.25 million ($3.65 million) after regulators found that the business’s systems consistently stopped working to reserve adequate cash to secure client deposits. The issues extended throughout a number of years, with everyday shortages reaching EUR5.2 million in 2024.

Ireland’s reserve bank revealed the charge Thursday, Oct. 22, following a settlement covering infractions in between November 2020 and August 2025. The central exchange (CEX) Coinbase states clients suffered no monetary losses, however regulators discovered severe weak points in how their cash was dealt with.

news Coinbase’s Customer Protection System Fell Short

The Central Bank of Ireland discovered that Coinbase Ireland relied too greatly on its U.S. moms and dad business’s systems to handle client funds without adequate regional oversight.

As an electronic cash organization, Coinbase Ireland need to keep consumer cash appropriately safeguarded and different from funds coming from other business. Regulators discovered that its systems consisted of estimation mistakes which some client funds were blended with cash held by other Coinbase organizations.

Those failures left its designated securing account except the needed quantity for a minimum of 18 months. The biggest everyday shortage reached EUR3.4 million in 2023 previously reaching EUR5.2 million in 2024.

news Coinbase Receives Discount on Regulatory Penalty

The initial charge was EUR4.65 million, however Coinbase got a 30% discount rate after accepting settle. The last EUR3.25 million fine and official reprimand still need verification from Ireland’s High Court. Karen O’Leary, the reserve bank’s director of enforcement, stated the regulator has “no tolerance for weak points in protecting plans.” Coinbase stated it reported issues to regulators, enhanced its controls and fixed the problems.

news 2nd Major Irish Penalty in Less Than a Year

The enforcement action follows a different EUR21.46 million great troubled Coinbase Europe in November 2025 over failures to appropriately keep track of cryptocurrency deals for suspicious activity. That earlier case included more than 30 million deals worth over EUR176 billion that were improperly kept track of.

The most recent charge issues a various Coinbase subsidiary and a various duty, safeguarding consumer cash instead of finding monetary criminal offense. Together, the 2 cases have actually cost Coinbase entities almost EUR25 million in Irish regulative charges.

Qubic’s recovery rules require ownership checks even for unstolen funds in vulnerable wallets

0

news

Qubic’s healing guidelines can leave the owner of a susceptible wallet requiring approval to gain back gain access to even when its funds were never ever taken. The blockchain network’s October 21 core upgrade includes even more frozen-address modifications to a style that reaches beyond coins currently taken by an assailant.

The occurrence included weakly created wallet tricks that an assailant might replicate. Both the aggressor and the initial holder can then produce a legitimate signature. Qubic’s recover guidelines Need proof beyond that signature before a claim is authorized.

news How the freeze modifications gain access to

The October 19 v1.308.2 release defines 2 unique escrow operations: moving drained pipes QU from aggressor identities and moving QU and properties from susceptible wallets. It likewise defines freezing susceptible identities, canceling their open QX orders and making tick 85,371,950 empty.

That is a more comprehensive intervention than tracing coins after theft. Its mentioned scope consists of protecting possessions before an aggressor has actually eliminated them. Canceling an open order likewise disrupts an existing pending guideline, so the healing style reaches open orders in addition to an easily offered QU balance.

The scope is address based. The release’s frozen-address lookup code loads identities from a list, transforms them to public secrets and checks whether a public secret comes from that set.

This difference separates 2 concerns a holder deals with: whether the wallet trick is hazardous and whether the address falls within the healing system. The released freeze system depends upon the address list, while safe replacement qualifications need a brand-new seed.

The October 21 release keeps the address limitations an existing concern. Its notes define more frozen-address updates and a date 236 beginning tick of 86,000,000.

Candidates should supply a noted source identity, a safe brand-new location, a signed message and ownership proof. The portal names exchange withdrawal records, earlier financing routes and signatures from untouched financing addresses as examples. Core designers examine that proof; the network’s computor quorum chooses and uses healing. The site itself moves no funds.

Didit identity confirmation is optional. The claim window goes through May 1, 2027. Under the released procedure, authorized addresses and quantities stand for 7 days before payment, while unsolved completing claims stay frozen in escrow.

CryptoSlate’s September 24 Coldcard healing protection explained an associated ownership issue: a public-address match started a claim, with checks still needed before a return. Qubic’s released core modifications include a protocol-level freeze of noted identities.

news A wallet repair does not end up the healing

The wallet repair addresses how replacement tricks are developed. Qubic’s v4.26.4 repository release is dated October 18 and consists of the protected seed-generation modification.

The connected spot changes seed production based upon JavaScript’s Math.random in both the create-vault and edit-seed circulations. A shared generator utilizes crypto.getRandomValues, declines byte worths that would predisposition the letter choice and stops working if safe randomness is not available.

Those modifications enhance the procedure utilized to create a brand-new seed. They do not reword the secret managing an existing wallet. Setting up fixed software application while keeping the old seed leaves that credential the same, which is why a safe and secure replacement identity needs a freshly created trick.

Qubic’s RPC endpoint reported date 236 at tick 86,154,732 throughout this evaluation on October 22, beyond the release’s 86,000,000 beginning point. Qubic’s paperwork determines the endpoint as a source of present tick details.

The healing paths likewise vary. The website appoints drained pipes QU still on Qubic to escrow healing, MEXC-bound funds to a different exchange procedure that it states is slower and depends upon law-enforcement cooperation, and weak-but-undrained wallets to launch after confirmation.

The examined releases, claim guidelines and tick pictures offer no fixed up undrained-balance overall or separately validated completed-repayment overall.

For impacted holders, the substantial step is brought back access to a safe and secure location. Qubic’s released style can safeguard noted balances from a jeopardized secret while making their release depend upon proof and cumulative permission.

Introducing the 2026 L’Oréal-UNESCO for Women in Science Awardees

0

Introducing the 2026 L’Oréal-UNESCO for Women in Science Awardees

Vox is partnering with L’Oréal UNESCO to celebrate its 2026 grant recipients.

L’Oreal Lede Static 1A
L’Oreal Lede Static 1A
Vox Media Creative

On October 22, Vox is co-hosting a panel and reception honoring the 2o26 L’Oréal-UNESCO for Women in Science 2026 Award recipients, our second year celebrating this group of scientists.

The program, part of the global L’Oréal-UNESCO for Women in Science initiative, recognizes five women postdoctoral scientists whose research ranges from bioengineering to astronomy. Meet them below:

Dr. Danielle Stevens: Innate Immunity, Computational Biology — University of California, Berkeley

Using artificial intelligence to speed up the engineering of disease-resistant crops by targeting plant immune receptors, with the goal of cutting global pesticide use and protecting our food supply.

Dr. Anna Romanov: Bioengineering: Immunology — Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Integrating bioengineering, synthetic biology, and immunology to build molecular technologies that reveal how B-cells evolve, then applying those insights to the development of vaccines and biologic therapies.

Dr. Katherine Lagerstrom: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology — Princeton University

Studying how human-driven change — pollution, antibiotics, captivity, and human contact — reshapes animal microbiomes and the way microbes evolve, including the spread of antibiotic resistance in the gut microbiome.

Dr. Clarissa Do Ó: Astronomy & Planetary Sciences — California Institute of Technology (Caltech)

Building the tools and technologies used to photograph planets beyond our solar system, laying the groundwork for finding new Earth-like planets rotating around Sun-like stars to allow deeper understanding of where our own planet fits in the universe.

Dr. Tana Pottorf: Neuroimmunology — The Ohio State University

Investigating the role of immune cells (macrophages) after spinal cord injury, aiming to develop therapies that preserve their helpful effects while curbing chronic inflammation and improving recovery.

At the event, Vox Media Creative will premiere five short documentaries exploring these scientists’ groundbreaking work.

Applications for the 2027 L’Oréal for Women in Science grants are now open.

See More:

The new human-crafted Apple Music brand matters in an AI world

0

Story text

Apple just revealed a new brand identity for Apple Music, with the expected turn to Liquid Glass. I’m not much of a fan of their new design language in general; this is where I admit that I’m still running MacOS Sequoia and have grumpy things to say about rounded corner radii and text legibility.

It’s just a trend, it will pass, and at some point I’ll probably cave and upgrade when it starts actually affecting my ability to get work done, or more importantly get security updates. Once I adjust, I’ll stop noticing it, and life will go on.

As such, I wouldn’t normally find an obvious rebrand like this notable, much less feel like I had much to say about it. But then I happened to catch Apple’s behind-the-scenes video in my YouTube recommendations, and I realized I did have thoughts.

It’s a short clip, respecting your time at just a little over a minute long if you want to watch for yourself.

Let’s get the obvious part out of the way: It’s pretty peak Apple. More than a little pretentious, with all the resources a $5 trillion market cap can bring to bear on every problem.

There’s a design agency (TBWA/Media Arts Lab), a pop hitmaker music producer (Fred again.. and yes, that’s how you spell it), a whole crewed set with cameras and lighting, and a mineral oil tank equipped with a transducer to effectively transmit audio signals into physical ripples.

They shot a ton of footage of the oil (chosen for its higher viscosity) interacting with the branding printed on transparent panels. Fast Company has a nice detailed breakdown of the technical aspects if you want to dig in more.

It’s a little eye-rolly with the narration, but honestly also lovely in the execution and care. And it made me realize how much I think we’re all going to value this kind of hands-on, human crafting in an era where anything can be generated out of a prompt.

Like many Ars readers, I have feelings about generative AI imagery. It’s feeling increasingly impossible to avoid in daily life. My new favorite term is “slop ghouls.”

One really unfortunate side effect of that persistence is a new natural tendency to be suspicious of everything you see. Was that picture you just saw hand-drawn, or did someone prompt it into existence with styles stolen from human artists?

I see us increasingly place genuine value on not just human-created craft, but seeing the process behind it that shows the hands at work. This Apple video was a neat bit of promotion, but it also provided the receipts. Real people did real things in the physical world to make the final images and videos.



Some stills from the video showing the process and people

Some stills from the video showing the process and people


Credit:

Apple

The final effect is obviously cleaned up and post-processed. But when I look at it now, I don’t just see Liquid Glass; I see the humans and their time and energy and creativity. To me, at least, that matters. Showing your work, proving the time you put in—I appreciate it. I’m slightly less grumpy for it!

Generative AI is likely here to stay. There’s no stuffing the genie back in the bottle. I probably need to find some peace with that, though I reserve the right to still yell at clouds about it. In the meantime, I think we should do more to celebrate human involvement in things and not be shy about showing the process and behind-the-scenes work.

Photo of Aurich Lawson


Aurich Lawson

Creative Director

Aurich is the creative director at Ars Technica, where he oversees the look and feel of the site as well as the day-to-day story graphic needs.

84 Comments

OMODA C4 to become first locally built Chery model in SA

0
19459006]src=”https://i0.wp.com/images.pmnsports.com/2026/10/localimages/250032026.06.08OMODA13240.jpg”> Beyond its production significance, the C4 will broaden OMODA’s crossover portfolio, targeting more youthful purchasers with angular styling and linked innovation.

Internationally showcased functions consist of a 13.2-inch infotainment display screen, a 540-degree electronic camera system and 50W cordless mobile phone charging.

Chinese automobile maker Chery Group has actually validated that its approaching OMODA C4 crossover will end up being the very first lorry produced at its freshly gotten Rosslyn producing center in Gauteng. The statement marks a considerable action in the group’s South African growth technique as it moves from importing automobiles to developing a regional production operation.

Chery got Nissan South Africa’s Rosslyn production center previously this year, signalling its aspirations to develop a production footprint in among Africa’s biggest vehicle markets.

OMODA C4 to lead production

The C4, at first revealed worldwide as the C3, will spearhead regional production, with fuel, hybrid and totally electrical derivatives verified for the South African market in 2027. The maker has yet to reveal production volumes, financial investment figures, work forecasts or the awaited level of regional material.

Shannon Gahagan, head of brand name and marketing for OMODA & & JAECOO South Africa, stated the financial investment represents a longer-term dedication to the domestic automobile market.

“The C4 will provide us a location in the nation’s production market, while its gas, hybrid and completely electrical variety will provide our clients higher option when purchasing an OMODA,” stated Gahagan.

Rosslyn upgrades and regional sourcing

Preparations at Rosslyn will consist of facilities upgrades and a provider advancement program planned to increase the percentage of in your area made elements.

The statement comes as federal government magnifies efforts to reinforce regional lorry production and lower dependence on semi-knocked-down (SKD) assembly operations.

Targeting South Africa’s SUV market

Beyond its production significance, the C4 will broaden OMODA’s crossover portfolio, targeting more youthful purchasers with angular styling and linked innovation. Globally showcased functions consist of a 13.2-inch infotainment screen, a 540-degree electronic camera system and 50W cordless smart device charging.

The in your area produced crossover might likewise enhance competitors in South Africa’s significantly congested compact SUV market, where Chinese brand names are challenging recognized producers. Last specs, rates and the accurate production start date stay unofficial.




Edward Moleke Makwana




  • Chery Group will produce its OMODA C4 crossover as the very first lorry at the recently obtained Rosslyn producing center in Gauteng, South Africa.
  • The OMODA C4, offered in gas, hybrid, and completely electrical versions, is set for the South African market in 2027.
  • Information on production volumes, financial investment, work, and regional material levels have actually not yet been divulged by Chery.
  • Rosslyn center preparations consist of facilities upgrades and a provider advancement program to increase regional element production.
  • The OMODA C4 intends to broaden the brand name’s crossover portfolio with functions like a 13.2-inch infotainment display screen and a 540-degree video camera system, targeting more youthful purchasers.

Report: U.S., Israel Draft Plans for Renewed Iran Strikes After Midterms — ‘Short, Intense’ Operation

0

World Cup

The United States and Israel have actually established in-depth prepare for restored military strikes versus Iran following the November 3 midterm elections, as American forces develop throughout the Middle East and the Pentagon silently rearranges soldiers in the middle of worries of Iranian retaliation, according to reports Wednesday.

The strategies consist of a “brief, extreme” military project possibly long lasting 3 days, targeting Iran’s nuclear centers, rocket and drone toolboxes, and energy facilities, the New York City Times reportedpointing out American authorities and others informed on the preparations.

Some military coordinators think a focused offensive might cause sufficient damage on Iran’s currently damaged economy to require Tehran into concessions, although others question whether extra strikes would break the diplomatic deadlock.
American and Israeli forces have actually heightened joint workouts, consisting of flights over Iraq practicing possible attacks, while a significant U.S. military accumulation is anticipated to be in location by early November.

The implementations are anticipated to bring 3 American carrier, countless Marines, extra fighter airplane, and unique operations forces into the area, broadening President Donald Trump’s military choices as the fight with Tehran continues.
The timing would follow Trump’s promise this month not to introduce brand-new American strikes before the November 3 elections. The president has actually not licensed another offensive and might eventually choose versus one.

The preparations follow an unannounced Monday see to Israel by War Secretary Pete Hegseth, who fulfilled Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Ovda Air Base and talked about the possibility of restored strikes versus Iran.
Hegseth consequently validated conference Netanyahu however decreased to divulge their discussion, while highlighting that American forces were prepared to perform extra operations if bought.

“We wish to make certain that Iran never ever gets a nuclear weapon. We’re prepared to contribute any method needed,” Hegseth informed press reporters Tuesday.
“We’ve done historical destruction to their military abilities, however if they’re not going to provide it up and the president asks to go even further– we’re prepared,” he included.
The conference came a day after Trump backed Netanyahu ahead of Israel’s October 27 election, clearly cautioning that the United States and Israel would complete their project versus Iran unless Tehran quickly altered course.
“Iran has actually been methodically damaged, both Militarily and Financially, and unless they alter their methods, quickly, we will quickly end up the task,” Trump alerted in his recommendation.

Trump likewise alerted that changing Netanyahu might leave Washington to face Tehran alone, highlighting the value he put on their collaboration.
The following day, Netanyahu strengthened that message throughout a discussion with Trump, informing him, “Donald, you stated we work to end up, and we’ll complete it together.”
“You’re a terrific warrior, and we’ll show that soon,” Trump responded.
That exact same day, lots of Israeli fighter jets and refueling airplane flew more than 800 miles through Syrian and Iraqi airspace towards Iran’s western border in what authorities referred to as a significant presentation of military power.
The airplane reversed without going into Iranian airspace after following a path looking like those utilized in previous strikes versus Iran.
Israel alerted Washington ahead of the workout, which Israeli authorities identified as a program of force and deterrence.

The activity followed an earlier Israeli proposition for a considerably bigger offensive that Trump apparently opposed.
According to the Financial TimesNetanyahu had actually looked for a multi-day battle project around October 10, targeting Iranian nuclear centers, power plants, other facilities, and websites related to the judgment program.
Israel supposedly provided Washington with an upgraded target list based upon brand-new intelligence, consisting of centers not formerly assaulted, for an operation anticipated to go beyond the strength of the opening U.S.-Israeli strikes in February.
Trump opposed resuming significant hostilities before the midterms, according to the paper. Israeli military sources have actually challenged elements of the reported preparations.
The prepare for a possible post-election offending come as the Pentagon reinforces its local forces while minimizing the direct exposure of soldiers stationed at susceptible setups.
NBC News reported Wednesday that American workers have actually been silently moved from bases in Jordan, Qatar, and Kuwait as a preventative measure versus possible Iranian retaliation.

Smaller sized contingents stay at the setups to keep air defenses and other vital security operations.
U.S. Central Command spokesperson Capt. Timothy Hawkins stated the military consistently changes releases to keep preparedness however decreased to talk about particular motions for functional security factors.
American diplomatic objectives have actually likewise taken preventative measures. The State Department bought the departure of non-emergency workers and qualified relative from Saudi Arabia in the middle of attacks by Yemen’s Iranian-backed Houthis, while other local posts have actually limited operations.
The increased preparedness comes as Iranian authorities threaten retaliation extending well beyond American and Israeli military targets.
Tehran has actually alerted that another offensive might activate attacks on local energy facilities, consisting of centers coming from U.S. allies, in addition to information centers and undersea interactions cable televisions.
An Iranian security authorities informed state-run Press television that the routine was gotten ready for an “full-scale, multi-layered, and extensive war,” while other authorities declined recommendations that Washington might determine the period or limitations of another fight.

Pakistan’s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, checked out Tehran today in an effort to restore mediation in between Washington and the Iranian program.
The Lebanese paper Al-Akhbar reported Tuesday that Munir communicated an American caution requiring nuclear concessions or running the risk of a massive military attack, possibly consisting of strikes versus Iran’s greatly strengthened Pickaxe Mountain nuclear center.
The account, based upon leakages pointed out by the Lebanese paper, has actually not been separately validated.
Pickaxe Mountain is likewise amongst the websites American military organizers have actually thought about for possible strikes, according to NBC News, although its deeply buried facilities provides substantial difficulties for standard battle operations.
The diplomatic deadlock centers on Tehran’s rejection to accept Washington’s nuclear needs.
The United States firmly insists that any arrangement get rid of Iran’s course to a nuclear weapon, while Iranian authorities are pushing for an end to the war, remedy for the American blockade, and the resuming of the Strait of Hormuz before dealing with substantive nuclear concessions.
Maj. Gen. Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, highlighted Tehran’s rejection to relinquish its enriched nuclear product throughout Munir’s check out.
“Not a single gram of enriched uranium will be gotten rid of from Iran,” Rezaei stated Tuesday.
“There will be no settlements till the United States takes actions to construct trust,” he included, requiring that Washington initially meet Tehran’s conditions.
The standoff comes as Netanyahu honestly requires the topple of Iran’s judgment program.
“The routine in Iran has still not discovered its lesson,” Netanyahu stated Wednesday throughout an Israeli military officers’ graduation event, implicating Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei of continuing his dad’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.
“There is just one method to eliminate this hazard at last: topple the program in Iran,” Netanyahu stated. “And that is my instruction to the IDF, the Mossad, and the security branches.”
Trump, on the other hand, stated Wednesday that the United States had actually currently ravaged Iran’s nuclear abilities and beat the program militarily and economically, while firmly insisting that the project’s gains need to be made long-term.
“We eliminated Iran’s nuclear enrichment capability with Operation Midnight Hammer, a gorgeous operation, and Operation Epic Fury,” Trump stated throughout remarks in South Carolina.
“And we beat them militarily, economically, and otherwise,” he included. “Iran will never ever have a nuclear weapon.”
The president recommended that American forces might withdraw right away however that Washington was figured out to protect a long lasting result.

“We might leave now, however we wish to ensure it lasts for a very long time,” Trump stated.
A day previously, Trump had actually worried that the damage caused on Iran’s nuclear program would be inadequate if Tehran might reconstruct it in the years ahead.
“We might leave today, and we would have done a great task, a fantastic task,” Trump stated Tuesday. “But it’s unsatisfactory for me. We need to make certain it does not take place in 5 years, 6 years, 10 years.”
The president likewise cautioned that the dispute would end “one method or the other extremely rapidly,” providing Tehran with an option in between reaching a contract and dealing with additional military action.
“We simply need to make a decision,” Trump stated. “Which method do we wish to win? Do we wish to win the good method or the not great method?”

Joshua Klein is a press reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @JoshuaKlein

U.S. Reportedly Considering Major Strikes on Iran After Midterms

0

The U.S. and Israel are supposedly establishing prepare for significant strikes on Iran after the U.S. midterm elections in November.

Mentioning individuals acquainted with the considerations, the New York City Times reported on Wednesday that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth talked about the possibility of restored strikes on Iran with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel today. Possible targets of the strikes supposedly consist of Iran’s energy facilities, nuclear centers, and rocket and drone toolbox. TIME has actually connected to the White House for remark.

U.S. authorities have actually consistently asserted that the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps are teetering on the edge of collapse however are intentionally lengthening the war in an effort to horn in Republican potential customers in the midterm elections. As soon as the elections are over, President Donald Trump guaranteed last month, the Iranian routine would rapidly capitulate.

“I believe the war is going to end right away after the election,” Trump stated. “They can’t hold out any longer.”Restored strikes might make complex that outlook.Some authorities have actually supposedly argued that resuming attacks for an extreme however restricted project would speed up Iran’s financial collapse, specifically as the nation has actually been squeezed by a continuous U.S. blockade on Iranian ports and financial sanctions project. The authorities hope the blow will make Iran more open to settlements.Trump has at times shared that view.Recently, Trump informed Newsmax he was thinking about extra military action in Iran, consisting of a possible strike on Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain, a nuclear center deep underground. His remarks came amidst reports that he was weighing releasing a 22,000 GBU-43/ B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb, likewise referred to as the “mom of all bombs.”

The President included the war would end quickly, be it through settlement or escalation.

“Do I wipe out the Islamic Republic and do it rapidly, never ever providing an opportunity to eliminate and damage individuals and nations once again? Do I drive them into hell without any opportunity of survival and no hope of future achievement or generations?” he stated in a speech to the United Nations General Assembly last month.”But I think we’ll negotiate,” he included, “right after the election.”

Will the U.S. restore strikes on Iran?Heightened battling in between the Iran-aligned Houthi rebels and the Saudi and Yemeni federal governments has actually threatened to develop a wider local crisis that might be more difficult to disengage from. The State Department on Wednesday bought nonemergency civil servant and their households to leave Saudi Arabia in the middle of intensifying attacks by the Houthis on Saudi facilities.

Israel’s Oct. 27 election might likewise raise the stakes of extra military action. Netanyahu, whom Trump has actually backed, would stay in workplace up until a brand-new federal government is formed, even if his bloc loses the election, and his federal government would keep the authority to purchase strikes throughout that shift. Restored strikes before the election, or after an electoral defeat, might welcome analysis. “One bought in the recentlies of a deadlocked project would be evaluated in Israel as politics along with method,” Gregg Roman, executive director of the Middle East Forum, composed in a September analysis.

The online forum examined that a massive Israeli strike on Iranian area, with or without U.S. involvement, was possible before the end of the year. Experts informed the Times Netanyahu might utilize the possibility of joint strikes to form a unity federal government that might enable him to remain in power. “The bigger restraint,” Roman argued, “is Washington.”

Trump has actually not yet authorized the proposed strikes, the Times reported.

Trump has actually likewise aborted strategies to restore attacks on Iran before. He supposedly obstructed an Israeli prepare for a multi-day offending versus Iran previously this month, and declined 5 propositions for significant operations versus Iran or the Houthis in current months.The U.S. and Iran have actually not exchanged significant combating in current weeks. The last reported U.S. strikes on Iran were on Sept. 8, even as Iranian attacks on business shipping have actually continued. Previously this month, Trump dismissed assaulting Iran before the midterms.

How might Iran react to brand-new strikes?Tehran’s unwillingness to make concessions to the U.S. appears to have actually reinforced, instead of damaged, throughout the war. Iranian leaders repeated today that they will not straight work out with the U.S. unless Washington accedes to specific needs, that include ending its marine blockade and launching frozen Iranian funds.

The preliminary U.S. and Israeli battle project on Iran that started the war on Feb. 28, along with June 2025 attacks throughout an earlier round of U.S.-Iran nuclear diplomacy, likewise solidified the Iranian view that the U.S. is not severe about working out. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated in March that the previous interruptions of working out rounds had actually increased mistrust in Washington.

Last month, the IRGC released an open letter attracting American citizens to “wrest control” from their federal government. In the letter, the IRGC stated: “Despite all the difficulties that our opponents trouble us, we will continue combating, as we have actually provided for the previous 47 years.”Both the U.S. and Iran appear to think they hold enough utilize to accomplish their objectives, and those “dueling understandings” have actually hampered development towards an offer, according to an Oct. 1 analysis By the New York-based nonpartisan research study company The Soufan.

Iran’s bottom line of take advantage of is its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway important to worldwide energy trade. Iran’s militarization of the strait has actually interrupted international oil and melted gas products, causing skyrocketing energy rates and inflation.

Iran’s capability to choke off local oil exports, nevertheless, seems subsiding. Middle East oil exports topped prewar levels recently as shipping business utilize alternative paths to bypass the Strait of Hormuz. HSBC Group Chief Executive Georges Elhedery likewise forecasted that Hormuz might be “redundant” in 5 years thanks to financial investment in alternative logistics paths.Iranian authorities informed the Times that they know the U.S. and Israel’s war preparation and are establishing their own methods.

Previously today, IRGC representative Hossein Mohebbi informed the Tehran Times that “even a restricted” attack from Washington would provoke a “severe energy crisis” for the world. Iranian Foreign Ministry representative Esmail Baghaei stated that an attack on Pickaxe Mountain would be consulted with an action “simply as difficult,” if not “more powerful.”

And previously this month, Iranian authorities stated Iran had actually prepared prospective vindictive operations that would leave from the U.S. and Israel’s presumptions. Security Chief Mohsen Rezaei informed Press television that Iran might react to restored attacks by targeting brand-new targets, consisting of U.S.-linked information centers and AI centers in the Gulf, along with subsea interactions cable televisions. Last month, Iran threatened to strike back versus any additional U.S. attacks by targeting U.S. oil and gas possessions in the Gulf.

In a post on Telegram on Sunday, Mahdi Mohammadi, a senior consultant to Iran’s arbitrator Gen. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, stated, if the U.S. and Israel attack, “they might wish to keep it short, however we will not enable it.”

He included on Wednesday: “The war will continue longer and throughout a broader location than the opponent determines.”

Meta Sued in Australia Over Alleged Harm to Children

0

Social network giant Meta was struck with a class action claim in Australia on behalf of kids and teens who apparently suffered damage over the addicting style functions and direct exposure to hazardous material on its platforms Facebook and Instagram.

Australian law office MinterEllison submitted the class action in the nation’s Federal Court on Oct. 9. The company revealed the match on Wednesday, stating it looks for to “recuperate settlement for both present and previous users” of the 2 Meta social networks platforms.

The class action, moneyed by Sydney-headquartered Litigation Lending Services, was generated the names of 8 unnamed lead candidates. Australia’s Federal Court on Monday bought a gag on reporting any info that might expose the candidates’ identities and their declarations of claim.

“This case raises crucial concerns about the style and operation of social networks platforms and their influence on kids and teens in Australia,” MinterEllison Partner William Nolan stated in its news release. “Those concerns will now be thought about through the Federal Court procedure.”TIME connected to Meta for remark. A representative informed Reuters: “We understand this claim and we will safeguard ourselves strongly.”The Australian federal government, which implemented the world’s very first social networks restriction for kids under 16, is likewise set to do something about it versus Meta and other social networks business. In a Bloomberg interview released TuesdayCommunications Minister Anika Wells, a 2026 TIME100 Next honoree, stated that the federal government anticipates to bring Meta’s Facebook and Instagram, ByteDance’s TikTok, Snapchat, and Google’s YouTube to court for supposedly stopping working to adhere to the nation’s laws.

U.S. parallelsThe Australian class action follows a number of civil success versus Meta in the U.S. In March, a Los Angeles jury bought Meta and Google to pay $6 million in damages to a 20-year-old complainant in a bellwether social networks dependency trial. In August, a New Mexico court bought Meta to pay more than $900 million and present a multitude of reforms to its platforms, consisting of strenuous age confirmation, time frame for users under 18 years of ages, and improved defense versus sextortion and kid sexual exploitation. The very same month, Meta consented to pay up to $18 billion to settle an across the country suit that declared its platforms were “addicting” by style and hurt kids.Rob Nicholls, a senior scientist at the University of Sydney with know-how on digital guidelines, informs TIME in an e-mail that he was “not shocked” with the class action, provided the cases in the U.S.”The U.S. claims were mainly worried about carelessness,” Nicholls informs TIME. “It’s most likely that in Australia the fit will be both carelessness and the effects of the supply of a hazardous item.”

Regulative enforcementAustralia has actually blazed a trail in attempting to check social networks platforms in the name of kid security. In 2015, it implemented a blanket restriction on kids under 16 from having social networks accounts, a relocation that other nations have actually followed. The effort, nevertheless, has actually been slammed by some, consisting of political leaders and digital rights supporters, for not being strongly enough implemented given that the restriction worked in December 2025. The most recent information from the nation’s online regulator, eSafety, reveals that 42% of kids aged 10 to 15 still own a social networks account.In a podcast released Thursday, Wells, the Communications Minister, stated there was a “terrific preliminary reaction” with 5 million accounts shut down, however that has actually given that “reduced.” She included that the eSafety Commissioner thinks the 5 platforms in specific might be doing more to adhere to the law and the Commission is examining prospective offenses.

Asked why there have not been any fines yet, Wells stated: “Unfortunately, this isn’t a policeman on responsibility pointing a speeding radar at a vehicle and releasing an on-the-spot fine. This is asking the eSafety Commissioner, our independent regulator, to handle a few of the most significant, wealthiest, most resourced business worldwide.”

In September, the Australian federal government increased the fines for noncompliant social networks companies. Stopping working to take “affordable actions” to avoid minor Australians from developing or keeping accounts might sustain an optimum charge of 109.2 million Australian dollars (around $76 million).Speaking to Bloomberg, Wells pointed to the multi-billion-dollar settlement Meta concurred to in the U.S. and stated, “I’m not persuaded that any specific dollar worth is going to alter it.” For her, the policy must be determined on how it develops cultural modification. “And cultural modification,” she stated, “requires time.”

PNFPB Install PWA using share icon

To install app on your device, tap the Share button in Safari. Scroll down and select 'Add to Home Screen'. Then tap 'Add' to place the app icon on your Home Screen.

Manage push notifications

notification icon
We would like to show you notifications for the latest news and updates.
notification icon
You are subscribed to notifications
notification icon
We would like to show you notifications for the latest news and updates.
notification icon
You are subscribed to notifications
Would like to install our app?

Progressive Web App (PWA) is installed successfully. It will also work in offline

Push notification permission blocked in browser settings. Reset the notification settings for website/PWA