The USDA’s Agricultural Research Service just recently published a brief piece on its “Scientific Discoveries” website called “Moving Forward with Lettuce Safety.” It is 2 paragraphs long. I read it 3 times.

I’ve been prosecuting E. coli cases considering that Jack in package in 1993. I’ve represented households sickened by polluted lettuce and spinach for the majority of the years considering that. When the federal government puts “lettuce security” in a heading, I pay attention.

Here’s my take. The science behind it is great. The concern it responds to is narrow. And the method it’s been offered to the general public misses out on the point of why we keep sending out kids and grandparents to the health center after they consume a salad.

What ARS in fact did
In between 2017 and 2020 the nation had a run of romaine E. coli break outs. Some disease clusters appeared far from the fields, in the Midwest and the Northeast. That got the market questioning “forward processing”– shipping whole, raw romaine from California and Arizona to plants back East, where it gets sliced, cleaned, bagged and offered regionally. Longer journey. More time in between field and wash line. Could that be assisting E. coli along?

ARS researchers led by Xiangwu Nou at the Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory set out to discover. The task ranged from 2022 to 2023 and was moneyed through the Center for Produce Safetythe fruit and vegetables market’s research study group. The group followed romaine from the exact same industrial field down 2 courses– one to a processor near the field, one cross-country to an East Coast plant– with information loggers riding in the bins. In the laboratory, they inoculated romaine with break out stress of E. coli O157: H7 and simulated both journeys.

The outcomes: no considerable distinction in how O157: H7 made it through or grew in between the 2 courses. Making it through pathogen numbers were in fact a hair lower on the forward-processing side. — and this matters– the forward-processed lettuce brought a much greater overall bacterial load and aged quicker in storage

ARS’s public conclusion: forward processing has actually been verified safe, and the market does not need to think of a pricey overhaul.

What the page gets incorrect, or neglects
A laboratory finding that E. coli does not grow quicker on a long truck trip is not the exact same thing as “validating the security” of anything. E. coli O157: H7 does not require to grow to harm you. The contagious dosage is small– as couple of as 10 to 100 cells. If the bug is on the leaf when it leaves the field, a cold truck to Maryland does not make it much safer. It simply does not make it much even worse. That is a helpful response to a narrow concern. It is not a security certificate.

Second, the page drops the finding that cuts the other method. Lettuce that takes a trip before processing reached the plant with a much heavier bacterial load and broke down quicker. The scientists stated that huge dive in general germs didn’t appear as more O157: H7 in their simulation. Fair enough. The public is worthy of the entire outcome, not simply the part that conserves cash.

Third, the task title assured more: antimicrobial vulnerability and infectivity. Did the long journey modification how E. coli reacts to sanitizers in the wash water? Did it alter how unsafe the bug is? The general public summary states absolutely nothing. If those concerns were responded to, inform us. If they weren’t, state so.

4th, take a look at who the page is composed for. Its punchline is that market was spared an overhaul that would have cost cash and interrupted supply. It likewise declares “loads” of lettuce are disposed of every year since of E. coli– without any number and no source. I desire that number. It might be the most essential reality on the page, since it informs us how frequently polluted lettuce gets captured before it reaches us. And by ramification, how typically it does not.

The huge one. The research study never ever asked how E. coli got on the lettuce in the very first location. Truck paths didn’t put livestock manure on romaine. The field did.

What we currently understand
We are not brief on hints. Spring 2018: romaine from the Yuma area sickened 210 individuals in 36 statesput 96 in the healthcare facility, provided 27 hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and eliminated 5. Detectives discovered the break out stress in a 3.5-mile stretch of watering canal. FDA kept in mind that canal sat beside a feedlot that can hold more than 100,000 head of livestockThe livestock market fasted to state no conclusive link had actually been shown. Obviously, the ecological tasting occurred in June– after the harvest was over and there was no lettuce delegated evaluate.

Fall 2018 and fall 2019: a returning stress of O157: H7 triggered 2 multistate romaine break outs out of Santa Maria and the Salinas Valley– 234 health problems in 33 states. Detectives indicated a polluted farming water tank in 2018 and livestock grazing on surrounding land in 2019. In 2019, Maryland– the exact same state where ARS did this work– discoveredthe break out stress in an unopened bag of salad

Fall 2020: FDA discovered the break out stress in livestock feces on a roadside about 1.3 miles upslope from a farm connected to the health problems. FDA stated clearly that break out examinations because 2013 indicate close-by livestock as a most likely contributing element, and informed Central Coast growers to treat this stress as a fairly foreseeable risk.

CDC now tracks these as REP stress — repeating, emerging or continuing. One, REPEXH01, consists of the 2018 Yuma break out. Another, REPEXH02, keeps returning from the California Central Coast fall after fall. It has actually shown up in ill individuals, bagged salad, watering tank sediment, a livestock trough and livestock feces. Current genomic work discovered the REPEXH01 pressure studied is a close relative of the 2006 spinach break out stress. These bugs live out there. They aren’t hitchhiking on trucks.

And it keeps occurring. In November 2024 a romaine break out sickened 89 individuals in 15 stateshospitalized 36, triggered 7 HUS cases and eliminated one. Fifty of the cases remained in Missouri, lots of connected to salads served at a St. Louis County high school. FDA traced the lettuce to a single grower and cattle ranch, verified romaine as the car– and closed the examination in January 2025 without informing the general public who grew it. We recognized Taylor Farms through our lawsuitsnot from the federal government.

3 petitions to close the spaces
After more than thirty years of these cases, the pattern appears. Private investigators discover the break out pressure at the edge of a livestock operation and stop at the fence. They determine which farm grew the lettuce and do not inform us. And when the food is pulled, no one can discover which shops, dining establishments or schools got it. I’m submitting 3 resident petitions with FDA, one for each of those failures.

The very first asks FDA to need gain access to and microbial tasting at animal feeding operations linked in multistate break outs. Keep in mind Yuma. Detectives took 6 samples inside a feedlot developed for more than 100,000 livestock– in June, for health problems that began in March. 6 samples is not an unfavorable outcome. It’s the lack of a test. In a 2025 evaluation of FDA farm examinations after leafy greens E. coli break outs from 2009 through 2021, FDA and CDC researchers discovered animals close by in every single-farm examination where that details was tape-recorded. They likewise composed that the 2 firms have no direct authority to get onto personal animals land. An operator can just state no.

The authority is currently in the statute. Area 361 of the general public Health Service Act lets FDA compose examination guidelines to stop the interstate spread of illness, and it names animals. FDA utilized it in 1975 to prohibit the sale of small family pet turtles that were offering kids Salmonella, which guideline has actually meant half a century. My petition requests something narrow: set off just by a composed finding that an operation is linked in a break out, time-limited, tasting just. No taking animals. No managing husbandry. Simply let private investigators stroll onto ground they’ve currently determined as the most likely source and take samples while the response can still avoid the next break out.

The 2nd asks FDA to stop dealing with the identity of a break out company as personal. On September 10, 2026, FDA closed a fourteen-person romaine E. coli examination and called no grower, no processor, no brand name and no state, stating the lettuce was previous life span. That’s the very same factor it offered for keeping peaceful about the 89-person break out in 2024. FDA has called farms, processors and brand names in precisely that scenario at least 8 times considering that 2006In October, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel informed HHS that the barrier is FDA’s own guidelines, which FDA has the authority to alter them. My petition asks it to: when public health plus traceback or genomic proof recognizes the source, the name is public– recall or no recall, life span or no life span.

The 3rd asks FDA to release retail consignee lists in every Class I food recall– the shops, dining establishments, schools, health centers and retirement home that got the item– and to categorize every recall within 10 days. USDA has actually released those lists for meat and poultry considering that 2008If you purchased remembered hamburger, you can discover whether your shop got it. If you purchased remembered bagged salad, you normally can’t. Congress informed FDA in 2011 to think about the USDA method, and FDA composed assistance rather. Worse, a list that connects just to the word “recall” can be evaded by never ever utilizing the word. This fall, chicken covers connected to a fifty-person E. coli break out were “proactively gotten rid of”– never ever called a recall, never ever categorized, no shop list. The general public found out the brand name from a claim we submitted, not from the federal government.

What else we require
Beyond the petitions, here’s the rest of my list.

Research study the source, not the truck. Where do REP pressures live in between break outs– livestock, water, soil, dust, wildlife? How do they move from feedlots or rangeland onto a leaf? FDA introduced a California longitudinal research study years earlier. The outcomes require to be public and became enforceable obstacle guidelines for feedlots and grazing near fruit and vegetables fields. Voluntary assistance has actually had more than a years to work. It hasn’t.

Implement the water guideline. FDA’s modified pre-harvest farming water guideline reached big farms in April 2025 and little farms in April 2026A guideline without evaluations, tasting and public information is simply paper. Inform us the number of farms have actually been examined and what was discovered.

Stop postponing traceability. FDA’s food traceability guideline, which covers leafy greens, was expected to work in January 2026. FDA pressed it to July 2028, and Congress then informed FDA not to implement it before that dateEach month of hold-up implies slower tracebacks and more individuals consuming the item after a break out has actually begun.

Check the item. Lettuce has no kill action. No one cooks a Caesar salad. We require regular, independent microbiological tasting of fruit and vegetables at market– the kind USDA did through its Microbiological Data Program before it was eliminated in 2012. Bring it back.

Inform the entire story. When ARS posts a public summary, consist of all the findings, connect the peer-reviewed paper, and state who spent for the work. Great science should have truthful interaction.

The bottom line
Forward processing didn’t make romaine more unsafe. Great to understand. The lettuce that sickened my customers wasn’t poisoned someplace on Interstate 80. It was infected in a field– typically near livestock, typically by water– by pressures we’ve enjoyed returned for many years.

Up until research study dollars, guideline and openness are intended there– beginning with these 3 petitions– “moving on with lettuce security” is going to look a lot like standing still.

news

Released:
November 06, 2026, 12:03 am

Last upgraded:
November 06, 2026, 12:02 am

French authorities are examining the death of a female who took in dried mushrooms.

At the start of November, health authorities were alerted about the death of a client following a serious case of poisoning, possibly connected to dried morel mushrooms cost a B&M shop.

The lady, who had no hidden health conditions, established intestinal signs on Nov. 2, a couple of hours after taking in the mushrooms. After calling her local toxin control and toxicovigilance center, she went to the nearby medical center. She passed away on Nov. 3.

Regional media reported the lady was a 27-year-old called Marie-Lou who resided in Montpellier.

Authorities are examining the prospective connection in between the intake of morel mushrooms, start of signs, and the death with screening underway.

Impacted sellers have actually started a withdrawal and recall of the morel mushrooms in concern. The Champibon brand name of mushrooms offered in a 60-gram container at B&M have a date of Dec. 1, 2029.

Customers who have actually the linked item are recommended not to consume it. They might stay poisonous even after being prepared.

If individuals experience digestion problems– such as diarrhea or throwing up– in the hours following the intake of the morel mushrooms, they must instantly call a Poison Control.

Scale of mushroom poisoning
In September 2026, almost 500 cases related to the selecting and consuming of wild mushrooms were reported to French toxin nerve center, and there were more than 200 cases in October, according to the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES).

In 2025, 1,300 mushroom poisonings were reported to toxin nerve center. One client passed away and 3 individuals got liver transplants since of Amanita poisoning. Considering that 2025, security is year-round. Most of cases were throughout mushroom choosing season, from July to December.

Analysis of 2024 information exposed that, in between July and December, 1,363 individuals with signs gotten in touch with a Poison Control Center after consuming mushrooms and 3 passed away. In 2023, 1,482 cases were taped.

A lot of poisonings happen when an edible types is misinterpreted for a dangerous one, when they are saved improperly, when mushrooms in a bad condition or insufficiently prepared are consumed, or when a lot of are taken in simultaneously. It can likewise be since a smart device app mistakenly determines the mushroom chose.

Joe Whitworth

Prior to reporting for Food Safety News, Whitworth worked for William Reed as editor of Food Quality News before ending up being food security editor for Food Navigator. He was called in the Top 40 Food Safety Professionals Under 40 in 2023.

All posts

More in Foodborne Illness Investigations

See all

Food security week concentrates on raw fish threat

A few of the threats connected with consuming raw fish have actually been highlighted ahead of Australian Food Safety Week. Research study from the Food Safety Information Council reveals 60 percent of Australians

FAO and WHO request aflatoxin and Brucella information

The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) are appealing for aid connected to aflatoxins in

cereals and Brucella. The very first require information covers aflatoxins[ 19659031]

Your Support Protects Public Health

Food Safety News is not-for-profit and reader-funded. Your TAX-FREE present makes sure continuous protection of break outs, remembers, and guidelines for everybody.